Your data strategy is dying in Google Docs



Why most CEOs are still flying blind (and how to fix it)
Why most CEOs are still flying blind (and how to fix it)
Why most CEOs are still flying blind (and how to fix it)
Your $2M marketing budget just delivered "amazing results" according to one dashboard, "concerning performance" according to another, and your sales team swears the leads are garbage.
Sound familiar? You're not alone. Most CEOs I speak with are drowning in conflicting reports, making million-dollar decisions with incomplete information, and watching competitors pull ahead while they're stuck debating which BI tool to buy.
The real problem isn't your technology. It's that your data isn't connected to your business strategy.
Today I want to share insights from my recent conversation with Dylan Anderson, head of data strategy at Profusion, who just finished interviewing 30 data leaders about what actually separates successful data initiatives from expensive failures.

The Business Strategy Temple: Why Most Data Projects Fail
Dylan uses a brilliant framework he calls the "business strategy temple" - vision at the top, supported by strategic pillars, with culture as the foundation.
But here's what shocked him: 90% of companies he visits can't clearly articulate what sits at the top of their temple.
When Dylan asks "What's your strategy?" the response is usually a handful of KPIs at best. No wonder data projects fail - you can't align data with a strategy that doesn't exist.
The real cost? You're building dashboards that measure everything and optimize nothing. Your team is drowning in manual reporting while missing the insights that could actually move your business forward.
The Tool Trap That's Costing You Millions
"What BI tool should we use?"
It's always the first question, but it should be the sixth. Dylan and I see this everywhere - smart CEOs fixated on PowerBI vs Tableau while their fundamental data infrastructure is held together with spreadsheet duct tape.
Here's the hard truth: A printing press is a printing press. The value isn't in the machine - it's in what you're printing and why people should read it.
Yet I regularly see companies spend $200K on dashboards built on broken foundations, then wonder why they still can't answer basic questions like "Which marketing campaigns actually drive revenue?"
The pattern that keeps repeating: Buy the tool, get frustrated it doesn't work as promised, blame the vendor, repeat with a different tool.
Why Enterprise AI Is Creating Two Classes of Workers
Here's where things get really concerning. Dylan's research revealed something troubling about how companies are approaching AI.
While leadership teams experiment with AI in secure sandboxes, they're simultaneously blocking staff from using these same tools to upskill and become more effective.
The message is clear: "We might replace you with AI, but we won't let you learn to work alongside it."
This isn't just unfair - it's strategically stupid. The companies that will dominate are those where humans and AI amplify each other, not where AI is developed in isolation to replace human insight.
Bottom line: If you're serious about AI transformation, start by letting your people learn these tools. Clean, connected data is step one, but human-AI collaboration is what creates sustainable competitive advantage.
The Single Customer View Trap
"We need a CRM" usually means "We want to understand our customers better."
But here's what nobody tells you: Installing Salesforce won't magically connect what customers do on your website, in your store, on your app, and in your support tickets.
I recently told a client exactly this: "I could implement your CRM, but you have no way to connect what customers are doing across touchpoints. It'll be an expensive rolodex until we fix the underlying data architecture."
Some consultancies will happily install that expensive rolodex and walk away. We won't.
What Successful Data Leaders Actually Do Differently
Dylan's interviews revealed one critical pattern: Every successful data leader shifted from thinking technically to thinking commercially.
They stopped asking "How can we build this?" and started asking "Why would the business care?"
The breakthrough moment: When they became best friends with the CFO and started speaking in business outcomes instead of technical features.
This isn't about dumbing down the technology - it's about connecting sophisticated data capabilities to real business problems that keep you awake at night.
That's it.
Here's what you learned today:
Data strategies fail when they're not connected to clear business strategy
Tool selection should come after strategy definition, not before
Enterprise AI initiatives succeed when they enhance human capability rather than replace it
Your next step: Before your next data meeting, write down three specific business problems you need to solve. Not technologies you want to buy - problems you need to fix.
If you can't articulate the business problem clearly, neither can your data team.
Your $2M marketing budget just delivered "amazing results" according to one dashboard, "concerning performance" according to another, and your sales team swears the leads are garbage.
Sound familiar? You're not alone. Most CEOs I speak with are drowning in conflicting reports, making million-dollar decisions with incomplete information, and watching competitors pull ahead while they're stuck debating which BI tool to buy.
The real problem isn't your technology. It's that your data isn't connected to your business strategy.
Today I want to share insights from my recent conversation with Dylan Anderson, head of data strategy at Profusion, who just finished interviewing 30 data leaders about what actually separates successful data initiatives from expensive failures.

The Business Strategy Temple: Why Most Data Projects Fail
Dylan uses a brilliant framework he calls the "business strategy temple" - vision at the top, supported by strategic pillars, with culture as the foundation.
But here's what shocked him: 90% of companies he visits can't clearly articulate what sits at the top of their temple.
When Dylan asks "What's your strategy?" the response is usually a handful of KPIs at best. No wonder data projects fail - you can't align data with a strategy that doesn't exist.
The real cost? You're building dashboards that measure everything and optimize nothing. Your team is drowning in manual reporting while missing the insights that could actually move your business forward.
The Tool Trap That's Costing You Millions
"What BI tool should we use?"
It's always the first question, but it should be the sixth. Dylan and I see this everywhere - smart CEOs fixated on PowerBI vs Tableau while their fundamental data infrastructure is held together with spreadsheet duct tape.
Here's the hard truth: A printing press is a printing press. The value isn't in the machine - it's in what you're printing and why people should read it.
Yet I regularly see companies spend $200K on dashboards built on broken foundations, then wonder why they still can't answer basic questions like "Which marketing campaigns actually drive revenue?"
The pattern that keeps repeating: Buy the tool, get frustrated it doesn't work as promised, blame the vendor, repeat with a different tool.
Why Enterprise AI Is Creating Two Classes of Workers
Here's where things get really concerning. Dylan's research revealed something troubling about how companies are approaching AI.
While leadership teams experiment with AI in secure sandboxes, they're simultaneously blocking staff from using these same tools to upskill and become more effective.
The message is clear: "We might replace you with AI, but we won't let you learn to work alongside it."
This isn't just unfair - it's strategically stupid. The companies that will dominate are those where humans and AI amplify each other, not where AI is developed in isolation to replace human insight.
Bottom line: If you're serious about AI transformation, start by letting your people learn these tools. Clean, connected data is step one, but human-AI collaboration is what creates sustainable competitive advantage.
The Single Customer View Trap
"We need a CRM" usually means "We want to understand our customers better."
But here's what nobody tells you: Installing Salesforce won't magically connect what customers do on your website, in your store, on your app, and in your support tickets.
I recently told a client exactly this: "I could implement your CRM, but you have no way to connect what customers are doing across touchpoints. It'll be an expensive rolodex until we fix the underlying data architecture."
Some consultancies will happily install that expensive rolodex and walk away. We won't.
What Successful Data Leaders Actually Do Differently
Dylan's interviews revealed one critical pattern: Every successful data leader shifted from thinking technically to thinking commercially.
They stopped asking "How can we build this?" and started asking "Why would the business care?"
The breakthrough moment: When they became best friends with the CFO and started speaking in business outcomes instead of technical features.
This isn't about dumbing down the technology - it's about connecting sophisticated data capabilities to real business problems that keep you awake at night.
That's it.
Here's what you learned today:
Data strategies fail when they're not connected to clear business strategy
Tool selection should come after strategy definition, not before
Enterprise AI initiatives succeed when they enhance human capability rather than replace it
Your next step: Before your next data meeting, write down three specific business problems you need to solve. Not technologies you want to buy - problems you need to fix.
If you can't articulate the business problem clearly, neither can your data team.
Your $2M marketing budget just delivered "amazing results" according to one dashboard, "concerning performance" according to another, and your sales team swears the leads are garbage.
Sound familiar? You're not alone. Most CEOs I speak with are drowning in conflicting reports, making million-dollar decisions with incomplete information, and watching competitors pull ahead while they're stuck debating which BI tool to buy.
The real problem isn't your technology. It's that your data isn't connected to your business strategy.
Today I want to share insights from my recent conversation with Dylan Anderson, head of data strategy at Profusion, who just finished interviewing 30 data leaders about what actually separates successful data initiatives from expensive failures.

The Business Strategy Temple: Why Most Data Projects Fail
Dylan uses a brilliant framework he calls the "business strategy temple" - vision at the top, supported by strategic pillars, with culture as the foundation.
But here's what shocked him: 90% of companies he visits can't clearly articulate what sits at the top of their temple.
When Dylan asks "What's your strategy?" the response is usually a handful of KPIs at best. No wonder data projects fail - you can't align data with a strategy that doesn't exist.
The real cost? You're building dashboards that measure everything and optimize nothing. Your team is drowning in manual reporting while missing the insights that could actually move your business forward.
The Tool Trap That's Costing You Millions
"What BI tool should we use?"
It's always the first question, but it should be the sixth. Dylan and I see this everywhere - smart CEOs fixated on PowerBI vs Tableau while their fundamental data infrastructure is held together with spreadsheet duct tape.
Here's the hard truth: A printing press is a printing press. The value isn't in the machine - it's in what you're printing and why people should read it.
Yet I regularly see companies spend $200K on dashboards built on broken foundations, then wonder why they still can't answer basic questions like "Which marketing campaigns actually drive revenue?"
The pattern that keeps repeating: Buy the tool, get frustrated it doesn't work as promised, blame the vendor, repeat with a different tool.
Why Enterprise AI Is Creating Two Classes of Workers
Here's where things get really concerning. Dylan's research revealed something troubling about how companies are approaching AI.
While leadership teams experiment with AI in secure sandboxes, they're simultaneously blocking staff from using these same tools to upskill and become more effective.
The message is clear: "We might replace you with AI, but we won't let you learn to work alongside it."
This isn't just unfair - it's strategically stupid. The companies that will dominate are those where humans and AI amplify each other, not where AI is developed in isolation to replace human insight.
Bottom line: If you're serious about AI transformation, start by letting your people learn these tools. Clean, connected data is step one, but human-AI collaboration is what creates sustainable competitive advantage.
The Single Customer View Trap
"We need a CRM" usually means "We want to understand our customers better."
But here's what nobody tells you: Installing Salesforce won't magically connect what customers do on your website, in your store, on your app, and in your support tickets.
I recently told a client exactly this: "I could implement your CRM, but you have no way to connect what customers are doing across touchpoints. It'll be an expensive rolodex until we fix the underlying data architecture."
Some consultancies will happily install that expensive rolodex and walk away. We won't.
What Successful Data Leaders Actually Do Differently
Dylan's interviews revealed one critical pattern: Every successful data leader shifted from thinking technically to thinking commercially.
They stopped asking "How can we build this?" and started asking "Why would the business care?"
The breakthrough moment: When they became best friends with the CFO and started speaking in business outcomes instead of technical features.
This isn't about dumbing down the technology - it's about connecting sophisticated data capabilities to real business problems that keep you awake at night.
That's it.
Here's what you learned today:
Data strategies fail when they're not connected to clear business strategy
Tool selection should come after strategy definition, not before
Enterprise AI initiatives succeed when they enhance human capability rather than replace it
Your next step: Before your next data meeting, write down three specific business problems you need to solve. Not technologies you want to buy - problems you need to fix.
If you can't articulate the business problem clearly, neither can your data team.
Get your free data maturity assessment today!
If you want to achieve ground-breaking growth with Enterprise-grade business intelligence as a key part of your success, then you're in the right place.
Get your free data maturity assessment today!
If you want to achieve ground-breaking growth with Enterprise-grade business intelligence as a key part of your success, then you're in the right place.
Get your free data maturity assessment today!
If you want to achieve ground-breaking growth with Enterprise-grade business intelligence as a key part of your success, then you're in the right place.